检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万长松[1]
出 处:《自然辩证法研究》2011年第2期44-49,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"苏联技术哲学与其工业化道路的关系及其当代价值研究"(09YJA720030)阶段性成果
摘 要:苏联技术哲学与其工业化道路的关系是非常复杂的。首先,二者之间并没有直接的联系,不能把苏联技术哲学当作其工业化道路的指导思想;其次,二者存在着间接的、内在的联系,认为苏联工业化道路与其技术哲学思想没有任何关系的观点也是错误的;第三,苏联技术哲学与其工业化道路之间是一种共生共荣、一损俱损、相互作用、互为因果的关系。本文对上述错综复杂的关系进行了历史考察与逻辑分析,指出在社会主义发展史中,苏联在看待和处理技术哲学与其工业化道路之间的关系问题上经验丰富、教训深刻,对发挥自然辩证法"为国服务"的功能具有启发和借鉴意义。The relation between the Soviet philosophy of technology and it's industrialization is very complicated.Firstly,there are not direct relation between them,the Soviet philosophy of technology can not be used as guiding ideology of it's industrialization.Secondly,there are indirect and inherent relation between them,it is also wrong that to consider the Soviet industrialization has no relations with it's philosophy of technology.Thirdly,the relation between the Soviet philosophy of technology and it's industrialization is coexistence and co-prosperity,one decreases the trend that is all decreased,interact with each other,reciprocal causation.The logic analysis and historical review on the above complex relation is carried out in the paper.The paper points out that the soviet union treats and handles the relation between philosophy of technology and industrialization in the history of socialist development is well experienced and profound lessons.It has enlightening and reference meaning to the "service for homeland" of dialectics of nature.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28