检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄平[1]
机构地区:[1]廉江市人民医院感染内科,广东省廉江524400
出 处:《中国基层医药》2011年第2期165-167,共3页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的观察比较替比夫定与拉比夫定治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的疗效。方法94例HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者按就诊顺序分别纳入治疗组(47例)和对照组(47例)。治疗组每天口服替比夫定600mg,对照组每天口服拉米夫定100mg,疗程均为48周。治疗前和治疗后4、12、24、48周分别检测血清HBVDNA、血清HBV标志物及ALT水平。比较两组48周时HBVDNA水平、HBVDNA阴转率、HBeAg血清转换率、ALT复常率。结果两组HBVDNA水平随治疗时间的延长均有所下降,治疗4周时下降最明显。治疗48周时,治疗组HBVDNA阴转率(72.3%)高于对照组(42.6%)(Χ^2=8.530,P〈0.05);ALT复常率、HBeAg阴转率及HBeAg血清转换率高于对照组,但差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论替比夫定可有效治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎,对血清指标的改善优于拉米夫定。Objective To investigate the curative effect of telbivudine versus lamivudine in chronic hepatic B with a therapy of 48 weeks. Methods 94 patients who were diagnosed chronic hepatitis B were investigated. The therapeutic group and the control group ( n = 47 ) were respectively assigned to receive 600mg of telbivudine and 100rag of lamivudine in 48 weeks. Copies of HBV-DNA.serum markers,alanine transaminase(ALT) level were tested before therapy and 4 weeks,i2 weeks,24 weeks,48 weeks in the the course of treatment. The HBV-DNA conversion, HBeAg conversion and the normal rate of the ALT were compared. Results The copies of HBV-DNA decreased as the treatment progressing, especially at the 4 thweek. Conversion rate of the HBV-DNA of the telbivudine group was 72.3% ,which was higher than the lamivudine group 42.6%. There is a significant difference between two groups (Χ^2 = 8.530,P 〈 O. 05). 95.7% of ALT in the telbivudine group revived to normal level versus 91.5% of the lamivudine group became normal There is no significant difference between two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). At the end of treatment,the rate of the HBeAg converting to negative in the telbivudine group is 38.3% versus the lamivudine group 31.9%, but there is no significant statistical difference between two groups (Χ^2 = 0. 420 ,P 〉 0.05). The frequence of seroconversion of HBeAg in the telbivudine group is 23.4% versus the lamivudine group 17.0%, but no statisticall difference between two groups ( ~2 = 0.594, P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion It was more effective to treat the HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis with telbivudine than lamivudine ,and lower frequence of seroconversion of the HBV-DNA,HBeAg.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28