检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省周口市中心医院,周口466000 [2]周口卫生学校附属医院
出 处:《临床医学》2011年第2期21-22,共2页Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的观察莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗老年性下呼吸道感染的临床疗效和安全性。方法选择老年性下呼吸道感染患者74例,随机分为治疗组(38例)和对照组(36例)。治疗组使用莫西沙星400 mg,对照组使用左氧氟沙星500 mg,均为静脉滴注给药,每日1次,疗程7~10 d,观察疗效与不良反应。结果治疗组和对照组的临床有效率分别为92.11%和80.56%,细菌清除率分别为93.33%和82.76%,两组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),两组间不良反应相似。结论莫西沙星注射液治疗老年性下呼吸道感染疗效佳且安全,优于左氧氟沙星注射液。Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of elderly lower respiratory tract infection.Methods Thirty-eight cases with elderly lower respiratory tract infection were included as treatmet group treated with moxifloxalin(400 mg,iv.qd,7-10 d)and 36 cases as control group with levofloxacin(500 mg,iv.qd,7-10 d).Results The total clinical effective rates of the treatment group and control group were 92.11% and 80.56%,and the baiterial eradication rates were 93.33% and 82.76%.There were significant differences of the above figures between the two groups.Conclusion Moxifloxacin is more effective and safe than levofloxacin in treating elderly lower respiratory tract infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.130.198