检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金春华[1] 陆开宏[1] 胡智勇[1] 谢丽凤[1] 梁晶晶[1] 张春景[1]
机构地区:[1]宁波大学教育部应用海洋生物技术重点实验室,宁波315211
出 处:《水生生物学报》2011年第1期75-79,共5页Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica
基 金:863国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2007AA10Z409);浙江省重大科技专项重点社会发展项目(2009C03017-4)资助
摘 要:采用改进常规耗竭法,研究了粉绿狐尾藻(Myriophyllum aquaticum)、凤眼莲(Eichhornia crassipes)在抑菌和非抑菌两种处理中对NO3-、NH+4吸收的动力学特征。结果表明:两种植物对NO3-和NH+4的最大吸收速率(Imax)和亲和力(1/Km)有显著差异,凤眼莲对NO3-、N H+4的吸收速率显著高于狐尾藻,说明凤眼莲更适宜用于污染水体养分的去除;不同植物对NO3-、NH+4表现出吸收偏好性,凤眼莲对NO3-有较高的Imax值和亲和力,而狐尾藻对NH+4有较高的Imax值和亲和力;抑菌处理能显著增加凤眼莲对NH4+的吸收速率,NO3-浓度高于1.00 mmol/L时,抑菌处理能显著减小凤眼莲对NO3-的吸收速率,狐尾藻对NO3-、N H4+的吸收未受到抑菌处理的显著影响。The nutrient uptake kinetics of M.aquaticum and E.crassipes were investigated by using the modified de-pletion method under nutrient solution of antimicrobial treatment and non-antimicrobial treatment.The maximum up-take rate(Imax) and Michaelis-Menten constant(Km) were estimated by iterative curve fitting.The Imax and Km for the plants was significantly different between two plants.The absorption rates of and in E.crassipes were significantly higher than that in M.aquaticum,illuminated that M.aquaticum was proper for treatment of the seriously polluted water.The Imax and 1/Km for was higher than that of in E.crassipes.In contrast,The Imax and 1/Km for was higher than that of in M.aquaticum.In E.crassipes,the absorption rates of in an timicrobial treatment were significantly higher than that in non-antimicrobial treatment,and the absorption rates of in antimicrobial treatment were significantly lower than that in non-antimicrobial treatment when the concentra tion of was higher than 1.00 mmol/L.There were no difference between antimicrobial treatment and non-antimicrobial treatment for the absorption rates of and in M.aquaticum.
分 类 号:X52[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70