检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏扬中市疾病预防控制中心,扬中市212200
出 处:《中国药房》2011年第10期946-947,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:对驾驶员用药情况进行调查分析,提高门诊药房窗口发药的质量,为驾驶员安全出行提供依据。方法:设计驾驶员用药调查表,对车站、码头及各公共场所出行的驾驶员进行随机调查,并填写调查表。结果:参与调查的1586人/次驾驶员中,行车前6h内或行车中服药的有284人/次,占调查总数的17.91%,有不良反应症状的68人/次,占服药人数的23.94%。在服药的284人/次中接受到药学服务的有223人/次,占服药人数的78.52%,被询问职业的仅32人/次,占服药人数的11.26%。服用抗感冒药的驾驶员最多,有121人/次。产生嗜睡的不良反应最为常见,有32人/次。结论:窗口发药时用药指导不到位,造成驾驶员服用药物不当。药师应加强执业意识,提高安全用药指导能力,从而帮助驾驶员减少交通事故的发生。OBJECTIVE: To investigate and analyze the safety of drug use in drivers and to improve the quality of window drug dispensing in order to provide reference for the safety of driving. METHODS: Questionnaire on safety of drug use in drivers was designed. The drivers in public places, station and wharf were randomly investigated, and filled questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 1 586 investigated drivers per time, 284 drivers who took medicine within 6 hours before driving or during driving accounted for 17.91%. Among 284 drivers, adverse drug reaction was found in 68 drivers per time, accounting for 23.94% ; 223 drivers received pharmaceutical care, accounting for 78.52%, 32 drivers were asked the occupation, accounting for 11.26%. Most of the drivers took anti-cold drugs (121 cases) and the lethargy was the most-common ADR (32 cases). CONCLUSION: Inadequate medication guide for window drug dispensing cause irrational use of drugs. Clinical pharmacist should strengthen vocational consciousness and improve ability of guiding safe drug use to avoid traffic accidents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90