事实·虚构·叙述——《藤野先生》阅读与日本的文化观念  

"Abandoning Medical and Undertaking Cultural Work":Fact,Fabrication and Narration—Reading Mr. Fujino and Japanese Cultural Ideas

作　　者：潘世圣[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学外语学院,上海市200241

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第1期113-118,155,共6页Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）

基　　金：2009年度国家社会科学基金一般项目<留日时期鲁迅与明治日本之实证研究>(09BZW047)

摘　　要：鲁迅曾在《藤野先生》和《呐喊.自序》中两次披露自己如何"弃医从文",围绕鲁迅自身的叙述,中日两国学界的"阅读"和"阐释"呈现不同形态。日本学界提出"弃医从文"叙述中存在"传说化"倾向,具有某些"虚构"要素;这一思考路向延伸到其国语教科书,是将收录的《藤野先生》定位为"小说"。其间既有学术研究的"证真""证伪"问题,更有文化传统、文学意识和思考路向的制约。由此可以考察中日阅读阐释的结构形态、差异由来及其潜在意义。Lu Xun twice revealed how he himself 'abandoned medical and undertook cultural work' in his articles of Mr. Fujino and Preface to Call to Arms. As to his narrations,there have been different 'readings' and 'interpretations' respectively in Chinese and Japanese intellectual circles. Some Japanese scholars argue that there is a 'legendary' tendency in Lu Xun's remarks,which contain some 'fictitious' elements. The extension of such a thinking path to the Japanese-language textbook has resulted in an orientation of Mr. Fujino,which is included in the textbook,as a piece of 'fiction'. This is concerned with the issue of 'verification' or 'falsification' in academic studies and what is more,with the conditioning of the cultural tradition,literary awareness and thinking path.

关 键 词：鲁迅 《藤野先生》 事实 虚构 叙述 

分 类 号：I210.6[文学—中国文学]