检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第2期76-81,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金资助(09BFX016)
摘 要:罢运事件的频频发生,折射出我国现行出租车行业准入制度存在严重问题。在我国,出租车行业的准入歧视分为两大类型:隐性准入歧视、显性准入歧视。从宪法学角度而言,上述两种类型准入歧视不但违背了法律保留原则、平等保护原则、不当联结之禁止原则、比例原则,也与宪法所规定的按劳分配的基本国策背道而驰。为此,在提高现行法律层级的基础上,我国必须重构现行的数量控制模式,并真正赋予公民个人以申领出租车牌照的权利。Frequent occurrence of taxi transport strikes in China reflects that there exist severe problems in taxi access system.In China,taxi access discrimination is divided into implicit and explicit ones.According to the Constitutional law,these two types of access discrimination are not only against the legal reservation principle,the equal protection principle,the forbidden principle of irrational relationship and the principle of proportionality,but also against the basic national policy of distribution according to work regulated by the Constitutional law.Thus,besides improving current law hierarchy,we should reconstruct the present mode of quantity control and give every individual citizen the right to apply for taxi license.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43