检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市罗湖区人民医院,518001
出 处:《中国医学创新》2011年第4期6-7,共2页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的比较肱骨干骨折的几种固定治疗方法。方法回顾自1998年1月~2009年12月用3种方法内固定治疗肱骨干骨折107例,其中外固定支架21例,钢板内固定49例,交锁髓内钉内固定37例,分别对疗效、并发症发生率作统计学分析。结果交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折其疗效明显优于外固定支架、钢板内固定,并发症发生率也较低。结论交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折效果优于钢板内固定及外固定支架。Objective To compare different types of fixation applied in humeral shaft fractures. Methods 107 patients with humeral shaft fractures admitted in the hospital from January 1998 to December 2009 were reviewed, among them 21 cases were treated with external fixators,49 cases with plates and 37 cases with inter - locking intramedullary nails, then effect and complications were analyzed by statistically method. Results The curative effect of fixation with inter - locking intr- amedullary nail was significantly better than other two fixation and the incidence of complications was lower compared with those fixed by external fixators and plates. Conclusion Inter - locking intramedullary nail is the best choice among the three methods in the treatment of humeral shaft fracture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28