家庭护理干预对癌因性疲乏病人的效果评价  

Effect and evaluation of family nursing intervention on patients of cancer-related fatigue

作　　者：钟碧琴[1] 彭丽君[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省深圳市西乡人民医院供应室,518102

出　　处：《护理实践与研究》2011年第5期12-14,共3页Nursing Practice and Research

摘　　要：目的:探讨癌因性疲乏的家庭护理干预的方法与效果。方法:将80例在本院完成治疗出院的恶性肿瘤病人按出院顺序奇偶数随机分为观察组及对照组各40例。观察组进行系统的癌因性疲乏家庭护理干预,对照组不加任何干预行追踪观察。应用简短疲乏评估量表及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织研制的生活质量核心调查问卷(EORTC-QIQ-C30)、卡氏行为状态评分法,分别在干预前及干预后6周对两组病人进行癌因性疲乏程度及生活质量评估。结果:干预前两组病人疲乏程度比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);干预后两组病人疲乏程度比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);干预后两组病人生活质量比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:系统有效的家庭护理干预对癌因性疲乏病人非常重要,对缓解、消除疲乏以及提高病人生活质量有明显优势。Objective ：Te study the methods and results of family nursing intervention on CRF. Methods： To divide the 80 patients who suffered malignancy but have left the hospital after being Completely cured into two groups by their parity orders for leaving hospital randomly ,40 patients in each group. In which intervention team will carry on family nursing intervention on CRF system but the comparison team will not have any intervention but only follow up the treatment obsrvation,Through fatigue Symptom inventory （FSI） and life quality questionnaire studied by the european organization for reserach and treatment of canele： （EORTC -QIQ -C30） , as well as Kamofsky performance status （KPS）, an evaluation was carried out to patients from the two groups before invention arid 6 weeks after invention respectively. Result：As a result ,we found that the difference of CRF of patientes from the two groups before invention have no prominent significance （ P 〉 0.05 ） ; but the difference of CRF of patients from the two teams after invention have prominent significance （ P 〈 0.05 ）,meanwhile the difference of life quality of the patents after invention have prominent significance （ P 〈 0.05 ） too. Conclusion：The effective family nursing system is very important for patients of CR.F and has significant advantages to alleviate and eliminate patients＇fatigue and improve their quality of life.

关 键 词：癌因性疲乏 家庭 护理 

分 类 号：R473.2[医药卫生—护理学]