检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄海星[1] 刘玉珍[1] 陈奕娜[1] 韩素琴[1]
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2011年第5期21-22,共2页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:对神经外科气管切开患者的人工气道湿化进行研究探讨。方法:采取随机抽样的方法,将76例气管切开患者分为两组,实验组38例采用持续加湿进行气道湿化,对照组38例采用常规滴入方法进行气道湿化。观察和比较两种人工气道湿化方法的效果。结果:实验组气道加湿加温效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论:采用持续加湿加温进行气道湿化能有效提高人工气道湿化效果,同时患者舒适、耐受,经济,减少临床护理工作量。Objective:To explore the effects of continuous humidified heating airway on the patients with tracheotomy in neurosurgery. Methods :76 patients with traeheotomy at neurosurgery department were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group were accepted the continuous humidified heating airway nursing and control group were given traditional humidity nursing. The quantity of sputum secretion, times of sputum absorption, degree of airway humidity and acute reaction of respiratory tract were observed. Results :The continuous humidify heating nursing was better than the traditional humidity group ( P 〈 0.01 or P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : The continuous humidifiy heating nursing is superior to the traditional humidity method in respect of keeping well effect of airway humidification and reducing the complications and burden of clinical nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30