检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:原岩波[1] 黄薛冰[1] 舒良[1] 李华芳[2] 王传跃[3] 吴文源[4] 赵靖平[5] 李鸣[6] 许秀峰[7] 张鸿燕[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学第六医院,北京100191 [2]上海市精神卫生中心,上海200030 [3]首都医科大学附属安定医院,北京100088 [4]上海同济大学附属同济医院,上海200065 [5]中南大学湘雅附二院,长沙410011 [6]苏州广济医院,苏州215031 [7]昆明医学院附属第一医院,昆明650032
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2011年第4期334-338,共5页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
摘 要:目的:以帕罗西汀为对照,评价度洛西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法:采用随机双盲多中心对照研究方法,244例患者纳入研究,度洛西汀组121例(60 mg.d-1),帕罗西汀组123例(20 mg.d-1),疗程8周。以汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表17项作为主要疗效评价指标。结果:度洛西汀组与帕罗西汀组的有效率分别为71.1%和71.5%(P>0.05)。度洛西汀的不良事件发生率(75.0%)高于帕罗西汀组(62.3%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.0381)。结论:度洛西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效与帕罗西汀相当,个别不良事件发生率度洛西汀高于帕罗西汀。Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in comparison with paroxetine in patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual fourth edition(DSM-IV) criteria of major depressive disorder.Methods: A randomized,double-blind,controlled multicentre clinical trial was conducted.All subjects(n=244) were treated with either duloxetine 60 mg·d-1(n=121) or paroxetine 20 mg·d-1(n=123) for 8 weeks.The main efficacy measure was the change in total score of the Hamilton Depression Scale 17 item(HAMD17) from baseline to endpoint.Results: The response rates were 71.1%(duloxetine) and 71.5%(paroxetine).There were no significant differences between 2 groups.The efficacy of duloxetine was non-inferiority of paroxetine's in treatment of MDD.There were significantly higher adverse events in the duloxetine group(75.0%) than in the paroxetine group(62.3%,P=0.038 1).Conclusion: Duloxetine and paroxetine have similar therapeutic effect in treatment of patients with major depressive disorder,but duloxetine causes more adverse events.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222