三种辅助教学工具在皮肤科教学中作用的比较  

Comparing effects of three kinds of supplementary teaching tools in dermatology teaching

作　　者：张玉杰[1] 于娟[1] 李建华[1] 舒春梅[1] 王忠永[1] 张建明[1] 

机构地区：[1]滨州医学院附属医院,山东滨州256603

出　　处：《中国高等医学教育》2011年第2期97-98,共2页China Higher Medical Education

基　　金：滨州医学院科技计划(BY210831)

摘　　要：目的:比较三种辅助教学工具在皮肤科教学中的作用,探讨提高皮肤科教学质量的方法。方法:结合以往教学经验,并分别以示意图、彩照影集、多媒体为主要辅助教学工具对三组学生进行授课,随后进行考试,将三组学生考试成绩进行比较分析。结果:示意图组学生成绩为76.95±4.59,影集组学生成绩为79.39±4.42,多媒体组学生成绩为89.19±4.71。三组学生成绩差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:多媒体辅助教学具有突出的优势,但三种教学工具各有优缺点,我们应该根据内容需要分别采用不同的辅助教学工具或者联合应用。Objective： To compare the three kinds of supplementary teaching tools in dermatology teaching, and explore the ways to improve the quality of teaching dermatology. Methods：With previous teaching experience, schematic, color photo album, multimedia was used as the main teaching tools in teaching respectively; examination was followed; test scores of three groups of students was compared. Results： The score of diagram group is 76.95 ± 4.59, photo album group is 79.39 ± 4.42 and multimedia group is 89.19 ± 4.71. There was statistically significant difference in examinations of the three groups （ P 〈 0.01 ）. Conclusions： Multimedia-assisted teaching has outstanding advantages, however, three kinds of teaching tools have their own advantages and disadvantages. Different teaching tools should be chosen or used in combination with the different teaching contents.

关 键 词：示意图 影集 多媒体 皮肤科 教学 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]