检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪海燕[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2011年第1期12-24,158,共13页Journal Of CUPL
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"刑事诉讼制度的法律移植研究"(07CFX042)阶段性成果
摘 要:从合法性的角度考量,我国大量刑事诉讼法律规范不具有合法性,具体表现为法律规范制定主体不合法、有关机关超越权限制定法律规范,以及有些法律规范僭越上位法。这种情形不仅影响了法律的权威性和法制的统一性,也违背了立法的基本原则,同时相关机关还通过这些规范扩充本部门权力,限制、剥夺诉讼参与人的合法权利。为消解此危机,根据实践发展需要,适时修改刑事诉讼法典,充实其内容,同时统一法律解释权,明确解释的权限和方式,完善全国人大常委会的法律监督是当务之急。A large number of criminal procedure laws do not have the legitimacy,which is represented by lawmakers' illegality,the relevant authorities'ultra vires legislation,and some legal norms transgressing higher laws. These cases not only weaken the legal authority and the unity of the legal system,but also violate the basic principles of the legislation. Furthermore,the relevant authorities expand their own powers through these legal norms,and restrict and deprive the legal rights of lawsuit participants. In order for the digestion of this crisis,according to practical development needs,we should amend the Criminal Procedure Code timely,to enrich its content,unify the power of legal interpretation,clearly explain the powers and means of legal interpretation,and improve the legal supervision of the NPC Standing Committee in time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229