检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢海英[1] 阎成美[2] 王爱民[2] 彭山铃[3] 谢志红[1] 翁建莲[1] 王丽娟[4]
机构地区:[1]南京军区福州总医院肝胆外科,福州350025 [2]南京军区福州总医院护理部,福州350025 [3]南京军区福州总医院培训中心,福州350025 [4]南京军区福州总医院手术室,福州350025
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第4期392-393,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:基金项目:军队“十一五”专项课题(062078)
摘 要:目的探讨卫生列车后送伤员中提高留置导尿术操作时效的有效方法。方法采用常规法和快速法对外科88例男性手术患者实施留置导尿术,对两种方法所用的时间和插入导尿管前尿道口黏膜细菌培养结果进行对比。结果快速法留置导尿术较常规法用时缩短67~70s,尿道口消毒效果与常规法相同,节省耗材成本占总成本的1/4。结论快速法留置导尿术操作用于卫生列车后送伤员,既可提高操作时效,保证消毒效果,也可节约耗材成本。Objective To investigate an effective method for enhancing the operative efficiency of urethral catheterization in wounded soldiers during the transportation of medical train. Methods Routine and fast urethral catheterization techniques were employed in 88 patients who received operation. The time and bacterial culture in mueosa of urethral orifice before catheter insertion were compared between the two techniques. Results The time for fast urethral catheterization was significantly shortened from 67 to 70 seconds compared with the routine technique. It only took 25 percent of the whole time to accomplish the operation. There was no significant difference in bacterial culture in mucosa of urethral orifice before catheter insertion between the two techniques. Fast urethral catheterization could save 25 percent of the gross cost. Conclusions Fast urethral catheterization increase operative efficiency, ensure effectiveness of sterilization and save the cost, which was more appropriate for wounded soldiers during the transportation of medical train.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.250.110