检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第451医院骨科,陕西西安710054
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2011年第1期89-90,共2页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的探讨肩胛骨骨折手术入路的选择及分析临床应用效果。方法从1997年7月—2009年1月对31例肩胛骨骨折患者采用三种不同的手术入路进行内固定,对比其临床适应证,分析治疗效果。结果 31例患者全部得到随访,按照Constant的评定标准:优22例,良6例,可3例,优良率为90.3%。结论肩胛骨骨折通过手术治疗可获得良好的疗效,不同的骨折类型应采用不同手术入路,可获得更好的治疗效果。Objective To explore the selection of operative approaches and the clinical result of shoulder blade.Methods From July 1997 to January 2009,31 patients of scapular fracture were treated with operation by three different operative approach to contrast clinical indication and analyses therapeutic efficacy.Results All patients were follow-up.According to the Constant's criteria,the results were excellent in 22 cases,good in 6 cases and fair in 3 cases.The satisfactory rate was 90.3%.Conclusion There is a satisfactory therapeutic effect on fracture of shoulder blade treated by operation.Different operative approach can provide satisfactory outcome to treat different fracture
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.136.20.207