检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖新生[1] 李月梅[2] 范兆金[1] 张家维[1] 刘炳权[3]
机构地区:[1]广州中医药大学,广州市机场路10号510407 [2]广州中医药大学第一附属医院 [3]广东省中医院
出 处:《中医杂志》1999年第11期663-664,共2页Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:对209例过敏性哮喘患者随机分别采用传统天灸和辨证贴药两种疗法治疗,观察比较各自的远近期临床疗效,并进一步分析了两种贴药方法的临床疗效和中医辨证分型的关系。结果辨证贴药法的近期总有效率高于天灸法,且其临床疗效与辨证分型密切相关,肺热型的近期疗效最高,而肾阳虚型最差。209 cases of allergic asthma were randomly divided into two groups, which received respectively traditional medicinal vesiculation and drug application based on syndrome differentiation, and their short - term and long - term therapeutic effects were investigated and compared, and the relation between the clinical therapeutic effects of the two application therapies and classification of TCM syndrome differentiation was further analysed. Results show that the total effective rate of the short -term of drug application based on syndrome differentiation is higher than that of medicinal vesiculation, and the clinical thertapeutic effect is closely related to classification of syndrome differentiation, the therapeutic effect of the short -term is the highest for lung -heat type and the worst for Yang-deficiency of kidney.
分 类 号:R256.120.5[医药卫生—中医内科学] R245.9[医药卫生—中医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.73.33