债权相对性与物权绝对性探讨  

Study on the Relativity of Creditor’s Rights and the Absoluteness of Real Rights

作　　者：韩宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南农业大学文法学院法律系,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2011年第2期27-30,共4页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

基　　金：河南省政府发展研究中心2010年度招标课题"城乡统筹条件下农村集体建设用地使用权法律问题研究"的阶段性成果之一;项目编号为B256

摘　　要：物权与债权的根本区别不在于债权的相对性和物权的绝对性,而在于二者权利内容的实现方式不同。我们不能把物权实现过程中他人不得干涉物权的实现与债权内容的实现方式即债权人请求债务人履行债务放在一起进行比较,并得出物权具有对世性而债权具有相对性的结论。对于特定的物权,由于其缺乏权利外观,其对抗效力几乎弱化为债权的对抗效力;对于特定的债权,由于法律赋予其权利外观,其对抗效力几乎强化为物权的对抗效力。The basic difference between real rights and creditor＇s fights is not in the absoluteness of real fights and the rela- tivity of creditor＇s rights, but in the ways to realize their fight contents. We can＇t conclude that real fights are against the world while creditor＇s rights are relative because in the procss of the realization of real rights nobody can interfere with it while in the proccss of the realization of creditor＇s rights the creditors must request the debtors to carry out the debts. The counter effect of some special real fights is almost weakened to creditor＇ s fights because of the lack of fight appearance; on the other hand, the counter effect of some special creditor＇s fights is almost strengthened to real rights because law gives it right appearance.

关 键 词：债权相对性 物权绝对性 支配权 请求权 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]