检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王胜和[1] 曲海虎[1] 朱素娟[1] 郑司亮[1] 张帅[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省章丘市人民医院急诊心内科,250200
出 处:《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》2011年第2期214-215,共2页Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
摘 要:目的以冠状动脉造影为金标准,评价64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像(64SCTCA)在冠状动脉支架术后随访中的临床价值。方法对33例支架术后患者共57个支架行CT冠状动脉成像,观察冠状动脉支架处是否再狭窄并与冠状动脉造影(CAG)结果对照。结果 64SCTCA检查显示57个支架部位再狭窄8处,与CAG相比误判3处,漏判一处,但两者差别无统计学意义。其敏感度和特异度分别达到了83.3%和94.1%。结论 64SCTCA能够较准确判断冠状动脉支架术后是否发生了再狭窄,可作为支架术后随访的重要手段。Objective To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of 64-slice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography(64SCTCA) in assess coronary in-stent restenosis in comparison with coronary angiography(CAG)(gold standard).Methods Thirty-three patients with 57 stents were underwent 64SCTCA to analysis the patency of the stents and the result was compared with that of CAG.Results 64SCTCA demonstrated that restenosis took place in 8 of 57 stents,and,in comparison with CAG,three of which were erroneously identified as restenosis and one of which missed.But the difference of the two methods was no significance.The sensitivity and the specificity were 83.3% and 94.1% respectively.Conclusion 64SCTCA can determine if stenosis occurred in stents of the coronary and is an important method in follow up after stenting.
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222