检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳建龙[1]
出 处:《南阳师范学院学报》2011年第1期24-37,共14页Journal of Nanyang Normal University
摘 要:本文对实务和理论中形成的对《国家赔偿法》中"上年度国家职工日平均工资"的"上年度"的两种见解,违法行为时上年度说和赔偿决定时上年度说分别进行了比较考察,认为虽然前者存在能够凸显国家赔偿与违法行为之间的因果关系,赔偿标准具有确定性、相对公平性、使受害人获得及时赔偿的优点,违法行为说比前说具有更好地促进依法行政、保障公民权利的优点,但若细究则可以发现上述观点均不能成立,二者均具有语义不明确、不利于公民权利保障的致命弱点。基于此并进一步提出改革国家赔偿标准的建议。Two controversial interpretations of the meaning of "the previous year" have been adopted by the courts in case of the State Compensation Law issues: one refers to the year before the time the illicit public action happens and the other the time the compensation decision was made.After comparing the two approaches,it is found that the former approach is able to illustrate the cause-and-effect relationship between state compensation and illicit actions,and the compensation standard is deterministic,impartial and prompt in getting the victims indemnified,and that the latter is better able to promote the legality of government work and protect human rights.However,neither of them will stand strict scrutiny,and both of them are ambiguous and hard to define,making them insufficient in human rights protection.In this regard,it is held that the State Compensation Law should be reformed accordingly.
分 类 号:D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.102.182