“避风港”条款的法哲学分析  

Philosophical Analysis of "Safe Harbor" Provision

作　　者：王杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权中心,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《佛山科学技术学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期16-19,共4页Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-10-0777)

摘　　要：自从美国《新千年数字版权法案》第512条规定了"避风港"条款以来,虽然版权人对该条款诟病颇多,但并未能阻止各国立法者相继将该条款引入本国版权法。实现正义是所有立法应当遵循的目标,也是所有立法能够得到普遍遵守的保障。"避风港"条款之所以具有旺盛的生命力,概是因为其实现了立法目的指向中的法律正义、立法责任分担中的法律正义与立法价值追求中的法律正义。since DCMA 512 stipulated the ＂safe harbor＂ provision, the criticism about this provision has been fierce, but it cannot prevent the other nations＇ legislators from bringing this provision to their own copyright law. Achieving justice is not only the aim of all legislation, but also an insurance of keeping the legislation generally obeyed. The vigorous vitality of ＂safe harbor＂ provision all originates from its realization of legal justice in legislative aims, responsibility distribution and legislative value.

关 键 词：“避风港”条款 工具 公平 公益 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]