检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董晓雯[1]
出 处:《湖南财政经济学院学报》2011年第1期78-83,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:WTO争端解决机制被喻为WTO乌拉圭回合谈判成果中的"皇冠上的宝石"和WTO多边贸易体系的"枢纽",可见争端解决机制是整个WTO法律体系的核心。在WTO争端解决机制中,报复制度作为救济措施之一,长期以来,因其自身所存在的诸多缺陷而备受争议,WTO成员及学者也为此提出了许多改革建议。从实践功能及文本规定两方面分析了报复制度所存在的缺陷,并对WTO成员及学者对其所提出的改革建议进行了评价。The WTO dispute settlement mechanism has been hailed as "crown jewel" of the achievements of the Uruguay Round Negotiation and "linchpin" of WTO multilateral trading system,so it is obvious that WTO dispute settlement mechanism is the core of the WTO legal system.In the WTO dispute settlement process,the appropriateness of retaliation,which is one of the remedies,has increasingly come under scrutiny in recent years.Several WTO members and scholars have put forward some proposals aimed at improving and clarifying the retaliation system under the DSU.This paper will try to examine and analyse the drawbacks of the existing retaliation system not only from practical angle but also textual angle.More significantly,this paper will sum up the reform proposals and give comments on them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249