检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尤霞光[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州电力高等专科学校电子信息系,河南郑州450004
出 处:《情报科学》2011年第3期338-341,共4页Information Science
摘 要:比较分析了基于能力成熟度的知识管理成熟度模型(CMM-Based KMMM)、非基于能力成熟度的知识管理成熟度模型(Non-CMM-Based KMMM)和通用知识管理成熟度模型(G-KMMM)在成熟度等级、等级特征与关键流程领域的异同,发现上述三类知识管理成熟度模型在模型基础、模型结构上是相同的,但在关键流程领域要素、评价方法、应用现状与趋势上是不同的。通用知识管理成熟度模型尽管是很全面和实用的,但仍需在实践中进一步验证与完善。This paper comparatively analyses the similarities and differences in maturity levels, chrematistics of maturity levels and key process areas for capability maturity model-based knowledge management maturity models (CMM-Based KMMM), non-capability maturity model-based knowledge management maturity models (Non-CMM-Based KMMM)and general knowledge management maturity models (G-KMMM), and finds the three kinds of knowledge management maturity models above- mentioned are alike in model basis and structure, but different in key process area, evaluation method, current status and trend in application. Although general knowledge management maturity models are very comprehensive and practical, they need to be further tested and perfected in practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.87.167