香港城市大学图书馆与清华大学图书馆书目规范控制的比较  

Comparison of Authority Control of Bibliography Between Run Run Shaw Library of City University of Hong Kong and Tsinghua University Library

作　　者：李凤侠[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学图书馆,北京100084

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2011年第3期69-71,共3页Library Development

摘　　要：香港城市大学图书馆和清华大学图书馆都采用INNOPAC管理系统,但由于历史背景和现实状况不同,它们在书目数据规范控制方面存在较大差异。根据对两所图书馆规范控制的出发点和定位、规范控制的模式和具体范围、规范记录的类型和格式、规范标目的选取标准及著录规则、规范控制工作流程5个方面的比较分析可知,清华大学图书馆可采取加大规范控制的范围、健全规范记录的著录项目、完善标目选取和著录的相关规则、充分发挥与规范控制相关的系统功能等措施完善规范控制工作。Run Run Shaw Library of City University of Hong Kong and Tsinghua University Library adopt INNOPAC management system,there are differences in their authority control of bibliographic data due to different historical background and reality.Through comparing differences between these two libraries in five facets,such as starting point and orientation of authority control,model and scope of authority control,type and format of authority records selection,standard and description rule of authority heading,working flow of authority control.Tsinghua University Library should take some measures to deepen authority control work,such as extending the scope of authority control,completing description fields of authority records,perfecting heading selection and description rules,giving full play to system function related to authority control.

关 键 词：大学图书馆 编目 规范控制 

分 类 号：G254.36[文化科学—图书馆学]