民事程序性再审事由及其规范化功能解析  

On the Regulating Function of Procedural Reasons for Retrial of Civil Cases

作　　者：郑金玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学环境与民商法研究所,河南开封475001

出　　处：《河北法学》2010年第8期65-71,共7页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：2009年度国家社科基金项目<诉权的法哲学研究--基于和谐社会中公民权利保障的视角>(09CFX004);2008年度河南省教育厅人文社科项目<民事再审事由程序功能解析>(2008-GH-030)

摘　　要：在我国司法实践中,如何把握部分新增程序性再审事由有一定困难,出于程序安定性考虑,需要谨慎适用,从严解释。其实,与纠错功能相比,程序性再审事由在扼制程序违法、促进庭审程序规范化方面的功能更为明显,我们应该借助再审事由进一步提高我国民事审判质量,以降低案件再审率。引入诉讼要件理论,规范常规性程序事项的运作,强化辩论权、质证权的实质内容,加强诉讼程序内部制约机制,都有利于减少案件被申请再审的比例。In the current judicial context of China,over many retrial decisions would impact the stability of civil judgments. In practice,many reasons for retrial such as the right to cross-examine and debate will be difficult to grasp. In fact,compared with correctional function,the regulating function of procedural reasons for retrial is more obvious. We should pay more attention to the function and mutual-restraint mechanisms in the internal proceedings of civil procedure,and we maybe introduce the theory of procedural requisite,which is more convenient in dealing with procedural matters.

关 键 词：再审事由 程序功能 辩论权 质证权 

分 类 号：D926.34[政治法律—法学]