后TRIPs时代我国知识产权反垄断的立法价值选择  

On the Choice of China' s Legislation Value of Intellectual Property Antitrust Law in Post-TRIPs Era

作　　者：彭心倩[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州大学法学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《河北法学》2010年第12期94-103,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：广东省人文社科重点研究基地<企业知识资产资本化研究>(09JDXM82005)项目阶段性成果

摘　　要：后TRIPs时代,我国知识产权保护水平已与世界先进国家标准接轨;但我国自主创新比例却相当低,知识产权已经成为国外知识产权权利人进入中国后封闭市场、排挤竞争对手的工具。一国的知识产权反垄断立法价值取向应当与其具体的国内外经济政治环境相适应,反映其"本土性"、"时代性"的特点。作为拥有知识霸权的发达国家,已放松了对知识产权反垄断的规制,持有利于知识产权人的立场;他们的立场与技术落后的发展中国家截然不同。我国在知识产权反垄断立法过程中,当务之急不是去寻求国外的立法技术移植;而是从战略高度确定知识产权反垄断的立法价值取向,即以社会公益为本位,强化反垄断规制。In post-TRIPs era, China＇s IP protection level has reached the world advanced country＇s standard. While low proportion in self-innovation of China, IP has become a tool of foreign IP rights holders to close market and exclude competitors while they entering Chinese market. The choice of legislation value of IP antitrust law should be in accordance with a country＇s domestic and international economic and political conditions, reflecting its own native characteristics and the nature of time. As IP giants, whose positions are totally different from those of developing countries, advanced countries have shifted their stand to protect IP rights holders and loosed their antitrust regulations. In China＇s IP antitrust legislation, the primary thing is not to transplant foreign legislation of IP antitrust law but confirm the legislation purpose of China＇s IP antitrust law, which should be on the interests of public benefit and with strong antitrust regulations.

关 键 词：后TRIPs 知识产权 反垄断 立法价值取向 

分 类 号：DF961[政治法律—国际法学]