检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘健[1] 马玉良[1] 王伟民[1] 赵红[1] 卢明瑜[1]
出 处:《临床心血管病杂志》2011年第2期119-122,共4页Journal of Clinical Cardiology
摘 要:目的:比较血栓抽吸导管及血小板糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂(GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂)在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)直接冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)过程中疗效的不同,探讨减少冠状动脉血栓负荷和改善心肌灌注的最佳策略。方法:回顾性分析因STEMI就诊,接受直接PCI的206例患者。根据直接PCI过程中对血栓处理方法的不同分为单纯直接PCI组、血栓抽吸或GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂组、血栓抽吸+GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂组。比较各组在术后慢血流或无复流、ST段50%回落率、TIMI帧数变化、左室射血分数(LVEF)及左室舒张末内径(LVDd)、大出血情况、住院期间死亡率等指标的差异。结果:血栓抽吸+GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂组与单纯直接PCI组相比,慢血流或无复流的发生率、术后TIMI血流帧数和最高导联ST段50%回落率均差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但术前TIMI血流0~1级患者比例更高(P〈0.05);血栓抽吸或GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂组与单纯直接PCI组相比,慢血流或无复流发生率,术后TIMI血流帧数,最高导联ST段50%回落率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。术后1周心脏超声示LVEF,LVDd以及住院期间死亡率各组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。术后大出血各组间差异亦无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:联合应用血栓抽吸和GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂可有效减轻STEMI患者接受直接PCI中冠状动脉内的血栓负荷,明显改善术前高血栓负荷患者心肌组织微循环的灌注。Objective:To Compare the difference between only primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombus-aspiration and/or platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists(GPⅡb/Ⅲa) in the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),we try to explore the best strategies to reduce thrombus burden and improve myocardial reperfusion.Method:We reviewed 206 STEMI patients who had done with primary PCI.The patients were arranged into 3 groups,including only primary percutaneous coronary intervention group,thrombus-aspiration or GPⅡb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists group and thrombus-aspiration plus GPⅡb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists group.We compare the different targets among the three groups,including rate of no-reflow or slow-reflow,post-procedure Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction(TIMI) frame counts,50% ST-segment elevation resolution(STR),the figures of Left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and Left ventricular diastole diameter(LVDd) by UCG,the rate of major haemorrhage,mortality in hospital.Result:Comparing with the only primary PCI group,thrombus-aspiration plus GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists group have no statistics significant difference in risk of no-reflow or slow-reflow,TIMI frame counts,50% STR(P0.05),but have more TIMI 0-1 blood rate flow pre-procedure(P0.05).The figures of LVEF and LVDD by UCG and mortality in hospital were no difference among three groups(P0.05).The rate of major haemorrhage was no difference among three groups(P0.05).Conclusion:The combine of thrombus-aspiration and Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonists can reduce thrombus burden,prevent the rate of no-reflow andimprove myocardial microvascular reperfusion in patients with STEMI during direct PCI.
关 键 词:心肌梗死 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 血栓抽吸 血小板糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂
分 类 号:R542.2[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.27