关于国内针灸系统评价／Meta分析方法学质量的思考  

Comments on Methodological Quality of Systematic Review/Meta-analysis on Acupuncture Therapy in China

作　　者：熊俊[1,2] 杜元灏[3] 

机构地区：[1]天津中医药大学,天津300193 [2]江西省中医院,南昌330006 [3]天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津300193

出　　处：《针刺研究》2011年第1期72-75,共4页Acupuncture Research

基　　金：国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目(2006BAI12B01)

摘　　要：随着循证针灸学的发展,国内有关针灸系统评价/Meta分析的研究日益增多,在针灸临床研究和实践中起着愈来愈重要的作用。但是只有高质量的研究才能有效地指导临床实践,否则将误导证据使用者。本文以OQAQ(Oxman-Guyatt Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire)为评价要点,分析国内针灸系统评价/Meta分析方法学质量的不足之处,以供同道参考。此外,笔者分析了影响系统评价/Meta分析质量的可能因素,提出了提高系统评价质量的一些方法。Along with the development of evidence-based medicine, more and more systematic review/Meta-analysis papers on acupuncture therapy have been published in China. Most researches have played an important part in guiding clinical study and practice on acupuncture. However, low quality researches may mislead the users. In the present paper, we analyze shortcomings of the published papers in China about systemic review/Meta-analysis on acupuncture therapy from the methodological quality according to the assessment tool： Oxman-Guyatt Overview Quality Assessment QuestJonnaire（OQAQ） ＋ Moreover, we also analyze some possible factors affecting the quality of systemic review/Meta-analysis and put forward a few of measures for improving the quality of systemic review.

关 键 词：针灸循证医学 方法学质量 系统评价Meta分析 

分 类 号：R2-03[医药卫生—中医学]