检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《世界贸易组织动态与研究(上海对外贸易学院学报)》2011年第2期57-64,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
基 金:何志鹏教授主持的教育部人文社会科学项目"和谐世界语国际法治"(07JA820006)的阶段性成果
摘 要:由于管辖范围存在重叠而又缺少协调规则,WTO与区域贸易协定间普遍存在着发生管辖权冲突的可能。实践中案例已有多起,本文仅以NAFTA为例分析了管辖权冲突产生的原因及后果,考察了WTO在实践中的做法及传统解决冲突原则能发挥作用的空间,得出冲突无法避免又实难解决的结论,并认为在此情况下减轻冲突不良后果的途径或许是一种更为明智的选择,指出NAFTA在实践中的做法将为其他区域贸易协定处理与WTO的关系提供有益的借鉴。Jurisdictional conflict may widely occur between WTO and RTAs since there is some overlap in jurisdiction and lack of coordination rules, There have been several cases in practice, this paper takes NAFTA for example analysing the causes and consequences of the jurisdictional conflict, examines the practice of WTO and the function of the traditional conflict resolution. The conclusion is that the jurisdictional conflict is unavoidable and insoluble, in this case, alleviating the negative consequences of conflict is perhaps an even more sensible choice. Finally, it indicates that NAFTA approach in practice would provide a useful reference to dealing with the relationship between WTO and other RTAs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.238.86