检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学法学院 [2]浙江图书馆
出 处:《教育与考试》2011年第1期59-63,共5页Education and Examinations
摘 要:我国高等教育资源的相对不足导致受高等教育权与其说是一种社会权,毋宁说是一项平等权。受高等教育权能否获得平等保护对于此权之实然享有至关重要。部属院校在各省区的招生名额应按各省区考生人数多少分配,以保障各省区考生受高等教育权平等。同时,为了实质平等,对少数民族考生应实行差别原则。受高等教育权的司法保护是该权利实现平等的最后防线。强化受高等教育权的司法救济乃为对其平等保护所必须。Due to the relative lack of higher education resources, the fights to higher education is regarded as an equal right rather than as a social right. How to equalize the rights to higher education is really critical for enjoying it ..The number of students to be enrolled in colleges and universities under direct supervision of ministries and commissions should be allocated according to examinees in provinces and re- gions so as to protect the examinees' equal access to higher education. Meanwhile, for the real equality, the difference principle should be implemented for minority examinees. Judicial protection is the last defense line for and the neccesity of achieving the equal rights to higher education.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63