检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊小娟[1] 李承华[1] 王春梅[1] 方园[1] 丁兴琳
机构地区:[1]九江市妇幼保健院
出 处:《九江医学》1999年第2期81-83,共3页Jiujiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止孕10~16周妊娠的临床效果。方法:对256例孕10~16周妇女,随机分为两组,一组(144例)给予米非司酮口服(为米索组),另一组(112例)给予利凡诺羊膜腔注射(为利凡诺组),观察两组的有效流产率、钳刮率及平均出血量。结果:两组有效流产率分别为9375%和7679%;钳刮率为0和1758%(P<0001)。平均出血量分别为7118±5575mL和10134±7392ml(P<001)。结论:米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止孕10~16周妊娠优于传统的利凡诺,可明显减少钳刮和流产出血量,作为一种非侵入性方法,简便、安全、有效,值得推广。OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic effect of joint administration of mifepriston and misoprostel for terminating 10-16 week 256 cases of pregnancy. METHOD: 256 cases of pregnant women were divided into two groups at random.One group was given mifepriston by oral administration and another group was given rivanol by intra-amniotic injection.The abortion rate and uterine curettage rate were compared in the two groups.RESULTS: 9375% women in mifepriston group and 7679% in rivanol group were successfully induced abortion.No women in mifepriston group and 1758% women in rivanol group need curettage (P<0001).The average bleeding was 711855 mL and 101347392 mL in the two group (P<001). CONCLUSION: Mifepriston joint with misoprostel is obviously better than rivanol in terminating 1016 week pregnancy and reducing uterine curettage rate as well as bleeding.It can be widely use clinically for its non-invasion,safety and convenience.
分 类 号:R169.42[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.191