检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110136 [2]辽宁省高级人民法院,辽宁沈阳110013
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年第2期138-143,共6页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(项目编号:08JA820017)<刑法竞合问题研究>的阶段性成果
摘 要:在中国刑法语境下,想象竞合犯处罚原则应当定位于"从一重重处罚"。"从一重"中的"重罪"应当采用宣告刑比较说,"重处罚"应将重于一罪、轻于数罪作为原则,并采用法定刑幅度中间线理论,同时,还要就轻罪的附加刑在量刑时予以考虑。此外,应当就追诉时效、亲告罪、既判力、自首、判决主文的表述等想象竞合犯的贯彻问题予以特殊关注,以便指导司法适用。In the context of Chinese criminal law,principle of punishment for imaginative jointer of offenses should be positioned in "heavier punishment in the most serious crime"."Heavier punishment" in "the most serious crime" should use the theory of comparative declared criminal."Heavier punishment"should be heavier than one punishment and lighter than several punishments and use the line theory of legal punishment amplitude.Also,when passing sentence,We should pay attention to the accessory punishment of the lighter one.In addition,we also should pay attention to the implementation problems of imaginative jointer of offenses such as prescription of prosecution,crime handled only with complaint,res judicata,special voluntary surrender,the formulation of judgment so as to guide the judicatory application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.169.229