检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省宜宾市第一人民医院骨科,四川宜宾644000
出 处:《吉林医学》2011年第7期1259-1260,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:评价无神经症状的椎体骨折后路复位固定行椎板减压的疗效。方法:通过随访三年前脊椎骨折,无神经症者后路切开复位固定病员52例的恢复情况,其中30例行后路椎板减压,22例未行椎板减压。结果:无神经症状的椎体骨折行后路手术行椎板减压相对愈后效果好及并发症少。结论:无神经症状的椎体骨折后路复位固定行椎板减压的疗效好,尚需更多的病例做综合分析。Objective To evaluate the healing effect of resetting posteriorly the non-neural symptom vertebral in a vertebral plate decompression way.Method By studying the recovery of 52 patients received the treatment of incising and resetting posteriorly the non-neural symptom vertebal fractures 3 years ago.Of the 52 patients,30 were treated in a vertebral plate decompression way,while 22 not.Results To the patients suffering non-neural symptom vertebral fractures,if they were treated in a vertebral plate decompression way,the recovery was better and the complications were fewer.Conclusion The treatment effect of resetting posteriorly the nonneural symptom vertebral fractures in a vertebral plate decompression way is good.Comprehensive analysis on more patients is needed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.65.132