检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡宇鹏[1]
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2010年第2期115-117,共3页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:作为国际法的一个分支,国际人道法旨在保护未参与或不再参与敌对行动的人员,并限制作战手段和方法的使用,因此,国际人道法也被称为战争法或武装冲突法。在国际人道法的传统理论观点中,非国际性武装冲突中的平民面对非法拘禁时不受人道法的保护。回顾1995年前南国际法庭上诉庭在塔迪奇一案中的判决所建立的标准,无论是国际武装冲突还是非国际性武装冲突保,面对非法拘禁时,平民均应受到人道法保护。As a branch of international law, international humanitarian law is designed to protect personnel no longer take part in hostilities, and limit the use of the war means and methods, therefore, international humanitarian law is called the law of war or armed conflict law. This article tries to explore and critique the traditional theory that international humanitarian law does not provide civilians with right to freedom from arbitrary confinement in non-international armed conflicts. Drawing upon the Tadie jurisdiction Decision rendered by the Appeals Chamber of ICTY in 1995, it will be preserved that a common core of protection for all civilians whether in international or non-international armed conflicts from unlawful confinement has emerged.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147