检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王郅强[1,2]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学行政学院暨社会公正与政府治理研究中心 [2]清华大学公共管理学院
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2010年第6期5-12,共8页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(09BSH052);北京市哲学社会科学规划重点项目(08AbKD061)
摘 要:频发的群体性事件已经成为政府治理的难题。在以往的治理模式中,存在着政府和民众双方对立的零和博弈思维,政府和民众各自存有一套相时而动的机会主义策略,其结果不仅做不到双赢,也不利于社会效益的最大化。只有通过思维的创新和谈判协商制度的构建,实现从零和博弈到正和博弈的转变,才能真正实现群体性事件的治道变革,从而促进社会的和谐。Currently,the frequently happened mass events in China have become a tough problem for government regulation,because these events are a matter of social order.This paper argued that the current solutions for mass event have some problems.The government and the civilians hold opposite views towards the mass event.As they could not express themselves well and the mass events are in a relatively low effectiveness,the government and the civilian all wait for the counterpart to move first and then find the proper response.The reason why they keep doing this is that they all treat this event as a lose-win situation.Such a thought hinders achieving the win-win result,and go against the maximization of social benefit.If they could change their attitudes and the negotiation principles,they could get a better solution for mass event,from lose-win result to win-win result to promote and maintain a better social regulation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38