检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓鹏[1] 陈红[2] Todd Jackson 刘琨[2] 杨周[2]
机构地区:[1]山西省长治市长治医学院社科部,山西046000 [2]重庆市北碚区西南大学心理学院,重庆400715
出 处:《中国疼痛医学杂志》2010年第6期342-344,共3页Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
基 金:国家重点学科(基础心理学)重大课题(NSKD08020)资助课题
摘 要:目的:在冷加压测试中考察不同认知信息对大学生疼痛强度、疼痛耐受力以及疼痛应对策略的影响。方法:100名健康大学生,随机分配到提供相应信息的威胁组和安全组(n=50)。冷加压测试后,记录疼痛耐受力、疼痛强度以及应对策略使用情况。结果:两组被试者疼痛强度没有差异;疼痛耐受力安全组(76.57±69.00s)显著高于威胁组(41.25±35.86s)(P<0.05)。安全组完成整个测试过程的人数(26人)显著高于威胁组(14人);在疼痛应对策略使用上,威胁组被试者采取分心、自我鼓励、忽视等应对策略的频率以及认知策略使用的总水平上都显著低于安全组被试者,在再解释和灾难化策略使用上,两组间无差异。结论:认知信息对中国大学生的冷压痛行为及应对策略有显著影响。Objective:To investigate the influence of dissimilar cognitive information on pain intensity,the time of pain tolerance and the coping strategies with the cold pressor test(CPT) in college students.Method:100 healthy students were randomly assigned to the threat group and the safe group with homologous texts.After the CPT,the time of pain tolerance,pain intensity and the coping strategies were recorded and questioned.Results: There was no difference between the two groups in the pain intensity.The time of pain tolerance in the safe group showed significantly longer than that of in threat group.And the number of subjects who finished the CPT in the safe group(n=26) was significantly higher than that of threat group(n=14).Meantime,the subjects in the threat group adopted less cognitive coping strategies such as diverting attention,self-encouragement,ignoring.No significant difference was found in reinterpretation and catastrophizing strategies between the two groups.Conclusion: The dissimilar cognitive information increased the time of cold pressor pain tolerance,and changed the coping strategy of Chinese college students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229