检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆400031 [2]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆400031
出 处:《内江师范学院学报》2011年第3期24-27,共4页Journal of Neijiang Normal University
摘 要:我国《合同法》第73条及相关的司法解释确立了我国的债权人代位权制度,并规定代位权只能通过诉讼的方式行使,由此产生了新的诉讼形式——债权人代位诉讼。由于我国的代位权制度抛弃了传统的"入库原则",从而使债权人代位诉讼诉讼标的的研究产生了新的困难。将债权人代位诉讼的诉讼标的界定为是债务人与次债务人之间的法律关系更加符合民事实体法与程序法的基本理论。对于法院对债权人与债务人之间的法律关系的判断,可以引进"争点效"理论予以解决,但同时应当以完善的债务人诉讼告知制度作为保障。The 73rd item of Contract Law and the relevant judicial interpretation have established the system of creditor's litigation with subrogation,which requires that the subrogation should be performed through litigation.And the new litigation form,the one with subrogation,was born.For the reason the system has abandoned the traditional relevant principle,this brings about the new difficulty in the study of the object of creditor's litigation with subrogation.It is more in accordance with the basic principle of the subject and procedure of civil law to define such object as the legal relation between creditor and debtor.As to the judgment of such relation,the court can give it a good solution with the introduction of some new theory.Meanwhile,it should be guaranteed with the perfect informative system of the litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200