检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王艳[1] 王荣荣[1] 赵龙凤[1] 任娇龙[1]
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学第一医院感染病科,太原030001
出 处:《中国药物与临床》2011年第3期259-260,共2页Chinese Remedies & Clinics
基 金:2009年人才引进与开发专项资金项目(08159)
摘 要:目的比较阿德福韦酯(ADV)与恩替卡韦对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的抗病毒作用,并探讨乙型肝炎病毒e抗原(HBeAg)、生化水平等对核苷类抗病毒药物作用的影响。方法收集2007年3月至2008年8月我院门诊CHB患者85例,随机分为2组,抗病毒治疗2年。采用多因素重复测量方差分析。结果 2种药物对乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)DNA的抑制作用比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.044);HBeAg(+/-)之间抗病毒效果比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)分组比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.597)。结论①恩替卡韦抗病毒快速平稳,优于ADV;②HBeAg(+/-)组患者均出现明显的病毒抑制,2年时阴性组HBVDNA水平低于阳性组;③ALT水平不影响核苷类似物的抗病毒作用。Objective To compare the anti-viral effects of adefovir dipivoxil(ADV) and entecavir(ETV) in chronic hepatitis B(CHB),and to study the impact of HBeAg and patient biochemistry on anti-viral effects of nucleoside agents.Methods Eighty-five CHB patients registered to our hospital clinics between March 2007 to August 2008 were randomly divided into two groups and underwent antiviral therapy for two years.Results Significant difference in HBV DNA inhibition by ADV and ETV was noted(P=0.044).The anti-viral effects were significantly different between HBeAg positive and negative subjects(P0.01),but not between patients with varied levels of ALT(P=0.597).Conclusion ①ETV appeared fast-and stable-acting as compared with adefovir.②Significant viral suppression was revealed in patients with positive or negative HBeAg.However,at the end of 2-year treatment,patients with negative HBeAg showed lower level of HBV DNA.③ALT level has no effect on the anti-viral activity of nucleoside analogues.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62