人体组织粘合剂与传统缝合方法行包皮环切的疗效比较(附500例报告)  

Therapeutic difference of body tissue adhesive and traditional suture in circumcision(500 cases report)

作　　者：张伟[1] 申岩[1] 杨文增[1] 马涛[1] 魏若晶[1] 崔振宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学附属医院泌尿外科,河北保定071000

出　　处：《中国性科学》2011年第3期4-5,8,共3页Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality

摘　　要：目的:对比研究人体组织粘合剂与传统缝合方法对包皮环切切口的治疗效果。方法:门诊包皮环切手术1000例随机分成A、B两组,A组500例包皮切口应用人体组织粘合剂粘合,B组500例应用可吸收线或丝线间断缝合,观察闭合切口时间、切口疼痛率、术后水肿情况、切口愈合分级等指标。结果:在关闭切口时间、切口疼痛率方面A组与B组差异有显著性(P<0.05)。在术后水肿情况、切口愈合分级方面两组差别无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:应用人体组织粘合剂行包皮环切术具有许多优点,值得临床广泛推广。Objectives： To study the different therapeutic effect of the body tissue adhesive and traditional suture in circumcision. Methods： outpatient circumcision 1000 cases were randomly divided into two groups, group A （500 cases）was performed with the body tissue adhesive, group B （500 cases） was done with traditional method. To study the difference of the time of closing incision, incision ache percentage, the condition of foreskin hydropsia and operative incision healing. Results： Compared with control group, group A has difference significantly in the time of closing incision, incision ache percentage, Nevertheless it has no difference significantly in the condition of foreskin hydropsia and operative incision healing. Conclusion： Circumcision with body tissue adhesive has many advantages over the traditional method, deserving generally clinical application.

关 键 词：人体组织粘合剂 包皮环切术 疗效比较 

分 类 号：R622[医药卫生—整形外科]