输注液与肝素液分别用于静脉留置针封管的临床效果比较  

作　　者：刁建君 

机构地区：[1]山东省烟台市经济技术开发区医院,264006

出　　处：《当代医学》2011年第10期122-123,共2页Contemporary Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较输注液与肝素液用于静脉留置针封管的临床效果,探讨输注液用于静脉留置针封管的临床效果及其可行性。方法选择采用静脉留置针输液的患者132例,根据自愿的原则,分为输注液组和肝素液组,输注液组采取患者输注液体正压封管的方式,肝素液组采取肝素稀释液正压封管的方式,比较两组患者封管效果、留置针留置时间及封管的维持时间。结果两组患者封管效果、留置针留置时间及封管的维持时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论输注液与肝素液正压封管的临床效果相似,但前者避免了后者的缺点与不足,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the clinical effects of infusion liquid and heparin iquid being used to seal tubes in the intravenous catheter and discuss the linical effects and its feasibility of sealing tubes in the intravenous catheter.Methods 132 patients infusing by the intravenous catheter were collected,according to the principle of voluntary,66 patients were divided into infusion group sealing tubes by the pressure infusion,66 patients were divided into heparin group sealing tubes by pressure heparin dilution,then compare the effects of sealing tube,catheter indwelling time and the duration of sealing tube.Results There was no significant（P0.05） in the effects of sealing tube,catheter indwelling time and the duration of sealing tube.Conclusion The infusion liquid＇s clinical effects of sealing tube was similar to the heparin liquid’s,the former avoided the shortcomings and disadvantages of the latter,it was worthy to be widely promoted in clinic.

关 键 词：静脉留置针 封管 输注液 肝素液 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]