检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵法伋[1] 郭俊生[1] 陈洪章[1] 邱璐[1] 李正银[1] 孙伟[1] 秦海宏[1] 葛学美[1] 周正国
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学军队卫生学教研室,上海200433
出 处:《解放军预防医学杂志》1999年第4期239-242,共4页Journal of Preventive Medicine of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:军队"八五"医药卫生科研基金
摘 要:目的:为研究热环境对能量代谢的影响,对热区部队炎热季节的能量消耗率进行了测定。方法:用气体代谢法。结果:气温30 .3 ℃,室内静坐能量消耗率3 .279 k J/( m2·min) ;气温32 .4 ℃,烈日下静坐能量消耗率3 .569 k J/( m2·min) ,烈日下静坐高于室内静坐,但无统计意义( P> 0 .05) 。气温32 .4 ℃,烈日下全装公路行军,能量消耗率为18 .181 k J/(m 2·min) ,显著高于室内和烈日下静坐。热环境下徒手行军能量消耗率为11 .429 k J/( m2·min) ;轻装行军能量消耗率为13 .455k J/(m 2·min) ;全装行军能量消耗率为15 .032 k J/( m2·min)( 气温略低于以前全装行军) 。结论:热环境和军事劳动对能量代谢均有影响,但以军事劳动更为显著。Objective:In order to study the effect of hot environment on energy metabolism, energy expenditure rate(EER) was measured in army men in tropical regions in hot summer. Methods: Gas metabolism method was used. Results: It was showed that EER of subjects sitting quietly indoors was 3.279 kJ/(m 2·min) at Tdb 30.3 ℃,EER of subjects sitting under burning sun was 3.569 kJ/(m 2·min) at Tdb 32.4 ℃,but there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between them. EER for marching with heavy load was 18.181 kJ/(m 2·min) under burning sun at Tdb 32.4 ℃,which was higher than that for sitting quietly indoors or sitting under burning sun. According to the load, the EERs of subjects marching in a hot environment were different. For example, the EERs of the subjects marching with unarmed,light and heavy load were 11.429 kJ/(m 2·min),13.455 kJ/(m 2·min) and 15.032 kJ/(m 2·min) respectively. Conclusion:Both hot environment and military labor could affect energy metabolism and the latter was more important than the former.
分 类 号:R131[医药卫生—劳动卫生] R821.5[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30