狂人庄子对庸俗庄子的颠覆——鲁迅《起死》对庄子精神的批判与继承  

The Subversion of Presumptuous Zhuang Zi and Vulgar Zhuang Zi——The Criticism and Inheritance of the Spirit of Zhuang Zi in Lu Xun's Qi Si

作　　者：王学谦[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《吉林师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2011年第2期6-10,共5页Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition

基　　金：吉林省社会科学基金项目"独与天地精神往来--鲁迅与道家文化"(编号:2008Bwx03)

摘　　要：鲁迅小说《起死》将庄子分为两半:一个是庸俗庄子,一个是狂人庄子。鲁迅批判庸俗庄子而继承了狂人庄子的精神。小说中道士庄子即是庸俗庄子的化身,汉子则是狂人庄子的隐喻。《起死》没有否定相对主义,只是否定了庸俗的相对主义。鲁迅以自己的视角对庄子进行了重新解释。Zhuang Zi was divided into two parts in Lu Xun＇s novel Qi Si ： one is Vulgar Zhuang Zi and the other is Presumptuous Zhuang Zi.Lu Xun criticized the spirit of Vulgar Zhuang Zi and inherited the spirit of Presumptuous Zhuang Zi.In the novel,Taoist priest was the avatar of Vulgar Zhuang Zi,while Han Zi was the avatar of Presumptuous Zhuang Zi.There is no denial of Relativism but the denial of vulgar Relativism.Lu Xun explained it in his own view of Zhuang Zi.

关 键 词：鲁迅 《起死》 庄子 庸俗庄子 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]