颜面烧伤后皮肤康复治疗频次与疗效观察研究  

Research on the correlation of treating frequency with therapeutic effect on rehabilitation of facial skin burn

作　　者：王淑君[1] 张媛媛[1] 卢军玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军总医院第一附属医院烧伤整形科,北京100048

出　　处：《中华损伤与修复杂志（电子版）》2010年第5期19-21,共3页Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition)

摘　　要：目的探讨不同皮肤康复护理频次对颜面部烧伤瘢痕康复作用的差异。方法 应用回顾性研究的方法,根据232例颜面部Ⅱ度烧伤患者面部护理频次的不同进行分组,其中高频治疗组96例,面部创面愈合后坚持隔日进行面部护理,10次一个疗程,坚持治疗3个疗程或以上;低频治疗组136例,行不定期面部护理,1～2次/周,坚持治疗6周或以上。对比两组治疗后的瘢痕评分。结果 治疗后瘢痕评分高频治疗组为2.00±0.16,低于低频治疗组的评分4.00±0.37(P<0.01),高频治疗组有效率97%与低频治疗组有效率83%差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 高频(隔日一次)的面部皮肤康复护理对面部烧伤后瘢痕的形成具有治疗效果,临床应加强此项宣教。Objective To observe the curative effects of different frequency cosmetic therapy on facial skin burn.Methods We retrospectively grouped 232 patients according to the different frequency of the cosmetic therapy.There were 96 patients in high frequency treatment group who can insisted on receiving treatment every other day.There were 136 patients in low frequency treatment group who received 1 to 2 times weekly treatment.We scored the scar of the two groups＇ patients after treatment.Results The scar score of high frequency treatment group was 2.00 ± 0.16 and the scar score of low frequency treatment group was 4.00 ± 0.37.The efficiency of high frequency treatment group was 97% and the efficiency of low frequency treatment group was 83%.There were statistically significant difference between them.Conclusion The high frequency cosmetic therapy was better than the low frequency.

关 键 词：颜面烧伤 皮肤护理 瘢痕康复 

分 类 号：R644[医药卫生—外科学]