检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟凡开[1] 孙立波[1] 舒振波[1] 李永超[1] 丁大勇[1]
机构地区:[1]吉林大学中日联谊医院胃肠外科,吉林长春130033
出 处:《医学新知》2011年第1期30-31,共2页New Medicine
摘 要:目的 比较PHS补片与疝环充填式补片在疝修补术中的优缺点。方法选取PHS补片疝修补术52例与疝环充填式疝修补术50例,比较两组手术时间、术后并发症、局部不适感、复发率。结果随访1~12个月,两组在手术时间、平均住院时间、切口脂肪液化及阴囊水肿发生率方面无统计学差异,随访期间内均无复发。PHS组术后1例发生局部异物感,疝环充填式疝修补术组有6例,两组差异有显著意义(P〈0.05)。结论疝环充填式无张力疝修补术和PHS补片疝修补术均具有术后复发率低、对机体创伤性小等优点;PHS补片疝修补术后患者不适感低,PHS补片疝修补术更适合Ⅲ、Ⅳ型腹股沟疝。Objective To compare the PHS patch and mesh plug herniorraphy in inguinal hernia. Methods 102 cases of inguinal hernia patients were included in this study, among which 52 cases were treated with PHS patch, and 50 cases with mesh plug method. Oeration time, local discomfort, postoperative complication, and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results No difference was found between the two goups in operation time, postoperative complication, and recurrence, except that the PHS patch group had a lower discomfort rate compared with the mesh plug" group. Conclusion Both the PHS patch and mesh plug hernia repairment are effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia. PHS patch is more suitable for type Ⅲ, Ⅳ inguinal hernia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222