生态补偿的科斯与庇古手段效率分析——以园林与绿地资源为例  

Efficiency Analysis of Eco-compensation by Coase and Pigou's Means:Case Study on Gardens and Green Space Resources

作　　者：黄飞雪[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学管理与经济学部经济学院,大连116024

出　　处：《农业经济问题》2011年第3期92-97,112,共6页Issues in Agricultural Economy

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目基金(编号:09YJC790025)

摘　　要：为了比较科斯手段与庇古手段对我国生态补偿的效率,本文以我国园林和绿地自然资源为例,采用30个省份2006—2008年的绿地面积以及政府投入年度面板数据建立线性回归模型,进而运用成本—收益原理进行实证分析。研究表明,所有权归属政府、经营权归属私人的产权配置方式能有效减少生态损失;政府每投入1万元,中国的城市园林和绿地面积将增加0.041公顷,证明了庇古手段对中国生态补偿确实有明显效果;各地区回归模型截距项不同,说明各地区的初始绿化情况有所差异。中国现阶段园林与绿地建设应采取庇古手段为主、科斯手段为辅的补偿机制。To analyze whether Coase and Pigou means could do well in the eco-compensation in China,taking gardens and green spaces for example,panel dates were taken to establish a linear regression.Then cost-benefit principle was used to draw the results:(1)The best way of right property allocation to reduce the ecological damage is title owns to the government and the right to operate belongs to the private.(2)The Correlation coefficient r is 0.041,which means if the government inputs 10,000 Yuan,the area of gardens and green spaces would increase 0.041 Ha.(3)The values of initial situation are of difference with Guangdong is the best and Qinghai is the worst,therefore,the government should give different compensations distinctly.The conclusion is that Pigou means is dominate and Coase means is subordinate.

关 键 词：生态补偿 科斯手段 庇古手段 成本—收益分析 园林与绿地资源 

分 类 号：TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计] F205[经济管理—国民经济]