市场环境下发电容量机制的对比与分析  

Comparative Analysis of Generated Capacity Mechanism in Power Market

作　　者：马军杰[1] 马向春[1] 韩锦瑞[1] 魏阳[1] 曾鸣[1] 鹿伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学能源与电力经济研究咨询中心,北京102206

出　　处：《水电能源科学》2011年第4期185-188,共4页Water Resources and Power

基　　金：美国能源基金会基金资助项目(G-1006-12630)

摘　　要：针对电力工业市场化改革在提高效率的同时陷入了发电容量投资不足的困境,从发电容量机制的设计原则入手,对广泛应用的三种容量机制进行了较为系统的分析。结果表明,这三种容量机制均兼具适用性与局限性,容量义务机制较适合我国目前的电力市场现状。The restructure of power industry can improve efficiency and it also leads to the plight of under investment in generating capacity occurred.Three kinds of mechanisms（mechanism of reserve capacity;capacity payment and capacity obligation） widely used are analyzed systematically based on design principles of generation capacity mechanism.The results show that three mechanisms have defects as well as advantages;overall,the capacity obligation mechanism is more suitable for China＇s power market.

关 键 词：电力市场 发电容量充裕度 备用容量合同机制 容量收费机制 容量义务机制 

分 类 号：TM73[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]