直陈条件句与“亚当斯论题”  

Indicative Conditionals and Adams' Thesis

作　　者：胡怀亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南师范大学哲学系,昆明650092

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2011年第3期19-23,31,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"不完全信息博弈论的归纳概率逻辑基础"(08DZX048);云南师范大学社会科学青年项目"直陈条件句非真值条件进路研究"(10QS08)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：条件句的概率进路是指人们把条件句的概率看作相应的条件概率,学界通常把这种思想称为"亚当斯论题"。学界对这个预设有两种截然不同的观点,他们围绕着"平凡结果"和"亚当斯论题"展开了激烈地论争。其实,这种条件句预设是存在问题的,对其进行进一步精致分析是恰当的。The probability approach of conditionals is a hypothesis that conditional probability is the probability of a conditional,some scholars usually called it as Adams＇ Thesis.There is a heated debate among scholars over triviality result and Adams＇ Thesis and scholars divide into two camps with totally different opinions.In fact,the hypothesis has some difficulties and it is appropriate to further refine it.

关 键 词：直陈条件句 亚当斯论题 质疑 反质疑 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]