转型期间我国新型工业化增长绩效及其影响因素研究——基于“新型工业化”生产力视角  

Study on "New-type" Industrialization Growth Performance and Its Factors during the Transitional Period——Based on "New-type" Industrialization TotalFactor Productivity

作　　者：庞瑞芝[1] 李鹏[1] 路永刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济与社会发展研究院,天津300071

出　　处：《中国工业经济》2011年第4期64-73,共10页China Industrial Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"转型期中国工业增长效率实证考察与提升路径研究"(批准号10CJL048);国家科技部软科学课题"环渤海地区扩大开放与区域创新研究"(批准号2009GXS1D010)

摘　　要：本文将实现低碳、节能和环保目标下的经济增长作为考察我国走新型工业化道路的终极目标,满足这四个目标的工业化被称为"新型工业化",并从"新型工业化"目标约束集出发,界定了"新型工业化"生产力的内涵。区别于传统的生产力测度方法,本文采用非径向、非角度的SBM方向性距离函数法,对中国1998—2008年30个省份工业部门的"新型工业化"生产力进行测算,以此评估转型期间我国新型工业化的增长绩效。研究发现:忽视资源与环境约束的传统生产力评价方式对中西部地区工业增长存在生产力高估;总体上看,我国工业部门增长绩效不容乐观,东部地区新型工业化程度要高于中西部地区,中西部地区面临着工业增长与资源环境相协调的艰巨任务。本文的研究结论支持"环境库兹涅茨曲线"与"波特假说",但否定了"污染避难所"假说。Growth, energy saving, environmental protection and low carbon, as a set of target constraints of ＂new-type＂ industrialization model in this paper. Accordingly this paper introduces the concept about the ＂new- type＂ industrialization total factor productivity. Different from the traditional method in TFP SBM directional distance function approach which is non-radical and non-oriented to measure the ＂new-type＂ industrialization TFP of industrial sector of China＇s 30 provinces in 1998--2008. It has found that： traditional evaluation methods which ignore the constraints of resources and environment overestimate the productivity of central and western regions. The empirical results of ＂new-type＂ industrialization TFP growth show that, generally, China＇s industry ＂new-type＂ industrialization growth situation is not optimistic, but the eastern region transforms to intensive growth before central and western regions. The coordination task of industrial growth and environmental protection is also very difficult in central and western regions. Conclusions of this paper support the ＂environmental Kuznets curve＂ and ＂Porter hypothesis＂, but deny the ＂pollution haven＂ hypothesis.

关 键 词：新型工业化增长绩效 “新型工业化”生产力 SBM方向性距离函数 

分 类 号：F421[经济管理—产业经济]