检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曲文轶[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学国际关系学院
出 处:《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》2011年第2期36-42,96,共7页Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies
摘 要:原苏东国家向市场经济的转轨已近20年。这场规模宏大的制度变迁到底带来了怎样的经济效果?本文从体制变革进展、经济增长与收入分配状况三个方面比较研究了原苏东国家的转轨实践,得出结论:体制变革速度与经济发展实效之间,一方面存在后发赶超优势,即转轨速度慢的国家尽管摆脱转轨衰退的时间晚,但中期增长速度加快,甚至普遍超越转轨速度快的国家;另一方面,体制转换速度与收入分配状况并无实质关联。It is nearly two decades since the former USSR and East European countries began their market-oriented economic transition.What economic effects did the gigantic institutional change bring forth after all? The article makes a comparative study of the transitional practice from three angles:institutional change,economic growth and income distribution.It comes to the conclusion that there is a subsequent catching-up and surpassing superiority between the speed of institutional change and the effects of economic development.To be more specific,the states that have been changing slowly,although they were late in getting rid of transitional decline,have accelerated their speed in the intermediate period,and even generally surpassed those in rapid transition on the one hand,and there is no substantial relation between the speed of institutional change and income distribution on the other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43