检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学经济学院,湖北武汉430070 [2]厦门大学管理学院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版)》2011年第2期280-283,共4页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information & Management Engineering
摘 要:在国际社会热议的已发生损失模型的替代方案中,预期损失模型与动态拨备法是两种主流建议。对比分析了预期损失模型与动态拨备法的特点和优劣,认为后者能比前者更好地弥补已发生损失模型的缺陷。进一步分析了我国商业银行贷款拨备的现状,提出可以借鉴西班牙银行业正在使用的动态拨备法对我国商业银行的贷款拨备实务进行改进的建议。Among the alternatives of the incurred loss model widely discussed in the international community,the expected loss provisioning and the dynamic provisioning are the major regulatory proposal.The characteristics,superiorities and weaknesses of the expected loss provisioning and the dynamic provisioning were comparatively analyzed.It was concluded that the latter was better than the former to demolish the defect in the incurred loss model.The status of the loan provisioning in China′s commercial banks was further analyzed,it was proposed that the dynamic provisioning being used by Spanish banking can be applied to improve the practice of the loan provisioning of China′s commercial banks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145