检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶正明[1]
出 处:《延边大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第2期135-139,共5页Journal of Yanbian University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目(09CFX037)
摘 要:药品在美国被认为是一种不可避免的不安全产品,有关其缺陷的概念及其判断标准与一般产品相比皆有其特殊性。美国第三次侵权法重述把药品缺陷分为制造缺陷、设计缺陷、使用说明或警示缺陷,并就其各自不同的判断标准做出了详细的评注,极大地方便了诉讼中的法律适用。我国目前药品侵权事件频发,而现有法律关于缺陷的规定值得商榷的地方仍然很多,造成了实践中药品缺陷认定的困惑,因此探讨美国在药品缺陷判断上的法律理论与判例经验,可以对我国相关制度的确立有所裨益。Medicine is considered as an inevitable unsafe product in America.The concept of medicine defects and the criteria related are different from those of ordinary commodities.The Third American Tort Law reinterprets medicine defects and divides them into defects in manufacturing,design,usage instruction and cautions.Different criteria are also commented in details.All of the above make the law application convenient in proceedings.The frequent incidents about infringing medicine at present show that laws and regulations concerning with medicine defects in China are imperfect so that it is hard to identify the defects in practice.The exploration of criteria on medicine defects identification and successful trials in America will be helpful for China to establish the relevant legal systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200